Category Archives: Players

Carey Price’s Goals Allowed: November 2010

In the second installment in this series, it’s time to visually inspect the goals allowed by Carey Price in the month of November 2010 (you can find Carey Price’s October 2010 goals allowed here).

November 2010 was a tremendous month for Carey, as the moustachioed one posted a 9-4-1 record with 3 shutouts and an aggregate save percentage of .947, this despite facing an average barrage of slightly more than 32 shots per game.

Advertisements

Carey Price’s Goals Allowed: October 2010

For your viewing, dissecting, and obsessing pleasure, I’ve put together a visual compilation of all the goals conceded by Carey Price in the first month of the 2010-2011 NHL season. Accompanying each visual is the meta-data about the goal, pulled directly from the NHL.com full play-by-play logs.

When analyzing the performance of a goalie, quantitative metrics like save percentage, goals against average, and won-loss record only go so far towards truly encapsulating the overall quality of that netminder. Qualitative assessments of each goal must be undertaken to paint a true picture of his performance.

I am far from being a goaltending specialist, but it is my hope that a technician can take this presentation and tell us a far more vivid and meaningful story about Carey’s strengths and weaknesses than the standard statistics allow for.

Carey: a postseason history

I did a shot-by-shot breakdown of Carey Price’s 2010 playoff performance and looked at his save percentage by every possible split. Working from the NHL play-by-play sheets, I was able to amass a lot of data about the shots he faced: situation, shooter, shot type, distance, and location on the ice. Below, you can see the variations in his save percentage from situation to situation.

I’m going to be taking a break from blogging for awhile to focus on some personal things, but my goal for 2010-2011 is to perform this type of tracking and classification for every single shot faced by Habs goalies. There’s just one thing missing from the NHL play-by-play sheets: shot trajectory. They don’t log the path a shot takes towards the net. So, from the logs alone, I have no visibility into whether a shot is going high glove side or low stick side or five hole or whatnot. To overcome that, I’ll chart each shot and then reconcile my numbers with the NHL.com play-by-play data. A fun challenge!

Anyway, see you in the new season. Enjoy Carey’s 2010 playoff numbers for now:

Split Goals Saves Shots Save %
Even strength 6 51 57 0.895
on Power Play 1 0 1 0.000
Short Handed 1 14 15 0.933
vs. Defencemen 0 15 15 1.000
vs. Forwards 8 50 58 0.862
Shooter’s S%: <10%* 1 19 20 0.950
Shooter’s S%: 10% – 14%* 6 21 27 0.778
Shooter’s S%: >14%* 1 25 26 0.962
Backhand 1 5 6 0.833
Slap 0 14 14 1.000
Snap 1 8 9 0.889
Wrist 6 35 41 0.854
Other type 0 3 3 1.000
1 – 15 ft away 4 14 18 0.778
16 – 30 ft away 3 17 20 0.850
31 – 45 ft away 1 15 16 0.938
46 ft + away 0 19 19 1.000
from Slot 5 24 29 0.828
from Carey’s LEFT 1 21 22 0.955
from Carey’s RIGHT 2 18 20 0.900
Neutral zone 0 2 2 1.000
* note that these are regular season figures

Habs’ Playoff Goaltending Performances: redux

A few weeks back, I prepared a post that compared Jaroslav Halak’s 2010 playoff series performances against those turned in by other Montreal Canadiens goalies, going back to Key Dryden’s rookie season. While I was happy with the piece I did, I had a lingering sense of doubt after it went out. Something was missing; the analysis was too simplistic, too cursory.

Later it came to me: in ranking Canadiens’ playoff goaltending performances solely on the basis of nominal save percentage, I was leaving at least three important factors out (there is a fourth factor, shot caliber, but there just simply isn’t enough data available prior to 2005-2006 to tackle this one). So, I went back and ranked each playoff series performance according to these three factors, and then created a weighted average of the three to arrive at the final performance metric. (Before I did this, I set the qualifying criterion at a minimum of 4 starts in a given series. That means that Steve Penney’s marvelous little 3-game run against Boston in 1984 is excluded from consideration.)

Here are the three factors, along with their respective weights:

1) Shot intensity (weight = 25%): Human fatigue plays a critical role during any 60-minute sporting event. A goalie that faces 18 shots and makes 17 saves gets credited with a save percentage of .944. A goalie that faces 38 shots and makes 36 saves get credited with roughly the same figure. But being able to maintain that save percentage over those 20 additional shots should count in that latter goalie’s favor. To put it in economic terms, the buildup of fatigue assigns an increasing marginal cost to each extra shot faced by the goalie, so—all else being equal—shots 34 through 38 should be tougher to stop than shots 7 through 11. Of course, there is the concept of the athlete who “gets stronger as the game wears on,” but I have to make the assumption that those athletes are special cases.

2) Opponent’s regular season goal differential (weight = 25%): On balance, the average shot coming off the blade of an elite sniper is more difficult to stop than the average shot coming off the blade of a 4th-line grinder. You can label that the God-given talent factor. Unfortunately, detailed shot-by-shot data doesn’t exist for most of the time period I covered. So, by way of proxy, I looked at the opposing team’s goals-above-league-average (expressed as a % of the league average) for that given NHL regular season. For example, in 2010, the Washington Capitals scored 318 regular season goals, while the NHL average was 233; so, their regular season goal differential (expressed as a percentage of the NHL average) would be 36%.

3) Series save percentage versus league average (weight = 50%): Call this my attempt to account for inflation. Improvements in goaltending equipment and goaltender technique, along with a series of other factors, have combined to push the average NHL save percentage up almost uninterruptedly since the league began tracking the metric officially back in the early 1980s. Put differently, posting a .910 save percentage back in 1984-1985 was quite a big deal, whereas it would have been fairly commonplace in 2009-2010. So, I calculated the delta between a given goalie’s series save percentage and the NHL average for the playoff year (the aggregated data comes courtesy of QuantHockey.com).

And here’s how the re-crunched data comes out:

montreal canadiens playoff goalies

In the end, Jaroslav Halak’s 2009-2010 performance against Washington comes out as the single best playoff series performance by a Montreal Canadiens goalie since 1983-1984. It’s a pity that I can’t push this back into the Dryden era, but I do feel better about this analysis than I did about the first iteration. While my method might not be perfect (having no way to measure shot quality across the years is quite unfortunate), I think you will find it to be far more rigorous than my first go round.

Jaroslav Halak’s 2010 playoffs in historical context

He shocked an entire league by morphing from part-time starter to all-world goaltender who owned Alex Ovechkin and Sidney Crosby. He put an entire city on his back and thrilled its people with his team’s deepest playoff run in almost 20 years. And finally, he was dealt for a guy named Lars.

Yes, of course, I’m talking about Jaroslav Halak’s 2010 springtime.

Much has been written about Halak being traded to St. Louis, with passionate voices being heard on both sides. To add context (and perhaps fuel) to the ongoing discourse surrounding the Halak move, I decided to look at his 2010 playoff performance in the light of the many wonderful playoff performances turned in by Montreal Canadiens goalies since Ken Dryden’s rookie season. I went back to the 1971 playoff season and isolated every single series performance turned in by a Montreal Canadiens goalie who had started at least three games in the relevant series. The results are visible in the table below. I concatenated three variables to create a code representing each series performance: goalie name-playoff year-round number. (e.g. Dryden-1979-2 for Ken Dryden’s performance in the second round in 1979).

Montreal Canadiens Playoff Goaltending Performances

Montreal Canadiens Single-Series Playoff Goaltending Performances (sorted by series save %)

As the table shows, Halak’s magisterial first round performance against Ovechkin and the Washington Capitals is among the top five single series performances turned in by a Canadiens goalie since 1971 (measured by aggregate save percentage in that series):

1. Steve Penney, 1984, Round 1 vs. Boston: .974 save percentage
2. Ken Dryden, 1976, Round 2 vs. Chicago: .973 save percentage
3. Ken Dryden, 1977, Round 2 vs. St. Louis: .962 save percentage
4. Patrick Roy, 1989, Round 3 vs. Philly: .940 save percentage
5. Jaroslav Halak, 2010, Round 1 vs. Washington: .939 save percentage

More impressive is the fact that he posted this save percentage while facing an average of 40.4 shots per 60 minutes played. Of the other goalies who registered top 5 single series performances, none faced more than 28 shots per 60 minutes. From a puck bombardment standpoint, the 40.4 shots per 60 minutes that Halak endured are the second most ever faced by a Canadiens goalie in a single playoff series, a hair behind the firestorm unleashed on Dryden by Boston in the 1971 playoffs (40.7).

In summary, when Halak was working his magic this spring, he was operating on a truly rarefied plateau. His heroics against Washington should be mentioned anytime discussions occur about the greatest Montreal Canadiens playoff goaltending performances.

The raw data that was used to compile the table above was pulled from Hockey-Reference.com and the Hockey Summary Project.